I still can not comprehend the situation we are stuck. I look at the standings and I can hardly believe it's real. Sunday we start again from Verona and once again I see it as the decisive game. With the same eyes I also saw the last three games with Cesena, Parma and Catania, I told myself that the only result that would have counted had the victory.
Perhaps it could be true with Parma, but, with hindsight, even if only two or three draws would take us a bit 'less, you would form a base from which to start to come. Now the good, to be saved, we are perhaps the last 10 minutes of the first half played against Parma, where we saw a team that believed that he wanted and that, with a couple of combinations looking for the speed in depth is managed to create problems for the opponent.
But the feeling is still prevalent to a widespread confusion. We lost the points of reference, on and off. Some also talk of bad luck, are only partially agree. We can talk about bad luck for the injury of captain - as there would have been useful in the last two games - and in the case of the pole taken by Poles against Inter, but for the rest? Against Parma we also had a penalty for that is an understatement to say generous and we wrong.
Wells's injury is unfortunate for the boy, but the fact that his absence is now seen almost as crucial is the result of another. Emblematic of the state of confusion that reigns supreme are also case management and Di Carlo Federico Macheda. Already at the beginning of the season I had expressed my concern be for the coach of Cassino the same team that last year had given perhaps even more than that it was with Luigi Delneri.
That I had already seen a sort of sovraresponsabilizzazione the coach with no position in society, in the sense: the team is the same, we have seen that can work, you've done the same, it is up to you. A partial confirmation were the words of President Garrone, not explicit, but with reference to the draws and formidable attack, however well understood.
What makes you think it's like the president himself, in his long interview with Christmas, is satisfied with the situation said of the standings with 26 points and a game already be recovered, however, in line with corporate objectives. Okay now to be defended is no longer Cavasin and Di Carlo, but a minimum of coherence in a complicated moment I think it would help.
What sense does it make now of Charles the scapegoat for everything? As long as the team was complete, while not playing well, the points we've made them. Why do not you rather have tried to put it immediately in the best conditions to work as he wanted? I think that means having to take a real playmaker for the 4-3-1-2.
But this is not worth almost nothing now, the fact remains that Di Carlo has paid for his mistakes and does not deserve him to be landed with others who are not his own. Macheda chapter. Kiko arrived here with great desire, it is intended that the interviews and issued by the first twenty minutes against Roma.
Once you're moved a lot, has often played the ball first touches or two giving a little 'speed of action, it has been proposed in areas where he also missed a diving header goal. With Udinese and AC Milan in Italian Cup has done pretty well and then began to fade with the rest of the team after a number of benches and the departure of Pazzini.
At age 20 you begin a new experience with all the best intentions, I hope to play alongside Giampaolo Pazzini holder and when you do this part anyway bench. The team does not run and you would like to smash the world, however, only excerpts. I think it is an easy psychological situation in which to take the field and in fact, against Parma, when available, were 75 minutes, although on and off, who's managed to show us something positive? The two actions at the end of the first time mentioned above or do not pass go off his feet? Balance, we must find balance.
In the field, but also in the stands and criticism. The confusion we have it around, everywhere, let's not drag us into the vortex and support the Sampdoria Football Union, as it is and will always be a happiness. 
Perhaps it could be true with Parma, but, with hindsight, even if only two or three draws would take us a bit 'less, you would form a base from which to start to come. Now the good, to be saved, we are perhaps the last 10 minutes of the first half played against Parma, where we saw a team that believed that he wanted and that, with a couple of combinations looking for the speed in depth is managed to create problems for the opponent.
But the feeling is still prevalent to a widespread confusion. We lost the points of reference, on and off. Some also talk of bad luck, are only partially agree. We can talk about bad luck for the injury of captain - as there would have been useful in the last two games - and in the case of the pole taken by Poles against Inter, but for the rest? Against Parma we also had a penalty for that is an understatement to say generous and we wrong.
Wells's injury is unfortunate for the boy, but the fact that his absence is now seen almost as crucial is the result of another. Emblematic of the state of confusion that reigns supreme are also case management and Di Carlo Federico Macheda. Already at the beginning of the season I had expressed my concern be for the coach of Cassino the same team that last year had given perhaps even more than that it was with Luigi Delneri.
That I had already seen a sort of sovraresponsabilizzazione the coach with no position in society, in the sense: the team is the same, we have seen that can work, you've done the same, it is up to you. A partial confirmation were the words of President Garrone, not explicit, but with reference to the draws and formidable attack, however well understood.
What makes you think it's like the president himself, in his long interview with Christmas, is satisfied with the situation said of the standings with 26 points and a game already be recovered, however, in line with corporate objectives. Okay now to be defended is no longer Cavasin and Di Carlo, but a minimum of coherence in a complicated moment I think it would help.
What sense does it make now of Charles the scapegoat for everything? As long as the team was complete, while not playing well, the points we've made them. Why do not you rather have tried to put it immediately in the best conditions to work as he wanted? I think that means having to take a real playmaker for the 4-3-1-2.
But this is not worth almost nothing now, the fact remains that Di Carlo has paid for his mistakes and does not deserve him to be landed with others who are not his own. Macheda chapter. Kiko arrived here with great desire, it is intended that the interviews and issued by the first twenty minutes against Roma.
Once you're moved a lot, has often played the ball first touches or two giving a little 'speed of action, it has been proposed in areas where he also missed a diving header goal. With Udinese and AC Milan in Italian Cup has done pretty well and then began to fade with the rest of the team after a number of benches and the departure of Pazzini.
At age 20 you begin a new experience with all the best intentions, I hope to play alongside Giampaolo Pazzini holder and when you do this part anyway bench. The team does not run and you would like to smash the world, however, only excerpts. I think it is an easy psychological situation in which to take the field and in fact, against Parma, when available, were 75 minutes, although on and off, who's managed to show us something positive? The two actions at the end of the first time mentioned above or do not pass go off his feet? Balance, we must find balance.
In the field, but also in the stands and criticism. The confusion we have it around, everywhere, let's not drag us into the vortex and support the Sampdoria Football Union, as it is and will always be a happiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment