Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Focus on Fiorentina where Mihailovic wrong?

What Mihajlovic gave Fiorentina? And 'This is the question to ask on a confirmation - that now seems obvious - that the technician performs the Serbian disappointing season in terms of results, standings and game. The factors that determine the course of a season are many and there is never proof to the contrary of what would have happened with a different technique.

But if, for the overall result is not always the merits and demerits can be attributed to the technical design, there are some specific situations (which we analyze below) in which the coach has his hand all right. We start from the players to be included, that is the new summer signings in January or those looking for a raise after the first difficult months.


Except Boruc (goalkeeper because that is a story in itself), Mihajlovic was unable to capitalize on the investments of the Fiorentina, in fact. Neither Felipe nor Bolatti (which he compared himself to Cortina, apparently mistaken assessment) has been recovered, so that both were sent back in January, far from Florence.

But much greater is the responsibility of technical failure in the purple violet - in these first nine months - or D'Agostino of circles, which could not even bring out some of their quality. And to think that a good director from the feet had been his first request in the market - at least Corvino turned out - a sign that problems of coexistence with tactical Montolivo even touched him.

It said that the Search is a player I always liked a lot ", but later I could never play it decently. Blame the players? Certainly it is a commonplace to think that the figure of mystery is crucial in the growth of young people. Role in which same moreover Mihajlovic has often praised. But what were the results? The purple rose of the first team this season there were three young, than the unfortunate Jovetic: De Silvestri, and Babacar Ljajic.

The first already experienced by age ('88) and 'football experience' (three seasons in Serie A behind them and the captain's armband in the Under 21 Italian), was called to the consecration of the season. But progress is not technical-tactical and even if they are seen Lollo ended up losing his job for the benefit of Comotto.

Ljajic was to be the star of the team, after the 7 million paid for him to Partizan and the encouraging of the appearances last season. Miha pointed on him a lot ... perhaps too much to assign the role of vice-Jovetic. And we know how it went. Babacar was instead the 'baby' of the group, but for society ready to make the vice-Gilardino, and even in this case signs of growth, after almost an entire season spent on the bench, you do not see.

Thank goodness there was Camporese, another young man - which, however, expectations were nil - with whom Mihajlovic was brave and was rewarded. Even if in the first game if they are not perfect untraceable. It 'still him the note on technical management of the most significant, perhaps the only one.

Yet the company does not appear dissatisfied with the work of Mihailovic enough to have already, in fact, decreed confirmation. Perhaps because the top of Fiorentina are part of that group which considers the role of the coach if not marginal, certainly not decisive. The golden age of Naples? Udinese and Parma, who are opposed to having exchanged technical? Lecce full of young and scraps that you save right? It all depends on chance, or in the words of Andrea Della Valle on Naples, is the luck of "wild fish as Cavani" We are confident ...?

No comments:

Post a Comment