ROME, Feb. 14 - Three-match ban. This court decision against sports Leandro Rosi (Roma) and Ezequiel Lavezzi (Napoli) after the episode of the Olympic spat. In all four rounds which will be served Rosi, since the three-day received for spitting at Lavezzi, must be added one-match ban for having been warned by a yellow card during the match against Napoli.
Motivations - Here are the reasons for the sentence of the court's casual: "The Judge, received from the federal prosecutor and timely reporting ritual art. 35, 1.3, CGS (received by fax at 11:43 today) about the conduct of the 19 ° for the first time by the player Aleandro Rosi (Roma Soc) against the player Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) and immediately following the conduct of the player Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) against the player Aleandro Rosi (Soc.
Rome); acquired and examined their images on television (Sky), for full warranty and technical documents, notes, television pictures documenting that in the circumstances reported, the player yellow-red circle in center field, well away from the in progress in other areas of the field, the player approached the Neapolitan, who turned partially away, and from a distance of about one meter, with obvious gestures, addresses a spit, which was immediately "returned".
"This reprehensible act two was not seen by the referee and, therefore, no disciplinary action was taken. In this regard, the race director, at the request of this Office, said, via e-mail was received at 12:03 today, "... .... I did not see anything and also confirm that the warning made to players and Rosi Lavezzi refer ....
a mutual the pushes." Captured images can not be determined with absolute certainty to what extent and in what area of the body ( presumably the neck and face Lavezzi Rosi) spits actually hit their respective addressee, but that fact is irrelevant to the subject assessment. It is settled interpretative guidance of the governing bodies of sports justice, the sputum must be considered in all the effects of a "violent conduct", the details of which can be integrated even if the intent has not reached the regrettable '"target".
antisportività and the accentuation of such conduct renders irrelevant the motivation of the characters from both the ground . It follows the eligibility art. 35, n. 1.3 CGS "testing television" and the enforceability art. 19, No 4 letter b) of CGS conducted signaled that it is fair to quantify the terms specified in the device.
PQM resolution in relation to the reporting of the federal prosecutor, to penalize players Aleandro Rosi (Soc. Rome) and Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) with disqualification for three days of actual competition. "APPLICATION NAPLES - The Naples, heralding the already submitted application, as confirmed by the lawyer blue Mattia Grassani to Mars Radio:" We sent already heralding the complaint to the Federal Court of Justice.
It will be discussed Friday at 13 or 15. The reasons should be studied in detail and there is time before the trial until Friday. Napoli ask the complete withdrawal of the ban, since there is the certain proof of Spit Lavezzi to Rosi. Where are not made this our first thesis, will be asked for a reduced sentence.
"The lawyer also said a Radio Kiss Kiss you ask the inadmissibility of evidence for unreliability TV: "The emergency procedure chosen by Napoli in the root of this claim can deposit the grounds until the opening of the hearing Friday at 13 or 15 to the maximum, so there are three full days to prepare the grounds.
The input received from Società Sportiva Calcio Napoli is to point to the lifting of sanctions, which will be required on the assumption that already sports the words of the court does not appear with absolute certainty, then is not overcome reasonable doubt that it can bring, and only in the absence of which a body for sporting justice may impose the penalty.
The principle is that when in doubt, it takes on the alleged perpetrator, not condemnation and then in the light of the movie and the words used by Tosel, at least some uncertainty about how the drawing and gesture and texture of the rise and reads the words of Tosel. We wait for the movie according to which the judge ruled, because from there we will start at which point you will reach the final conclusion on the question of inadmissibility of evidence for non-uniqueness TV and unreliability in terms of technical and documentary.
Then we will proceed with an application for reduction in secondarily, if not accepted the request for withdrawal. "There is no 'CERTAINTY OF DOCUMENT" - "We saw on television the image - Grassani continues - and there is no certainty as to the salivary fluid leakage from the mouth of Lavezzi.
From these movies we've seen, it is not clear. Leaving aside what he did to Rosie Lavezzi, the Argentine was banned for spitting a reaction. That's why we asked for the acquisition of the media movie that led the judge to rule on the disqualification. According Tosel video gives evidence, reliability and certainty as to the dynamic behavior of the two players.
Awaiting only the segment-Rosi Lavezzi, in our opinion lacks the kind of uniqueness. Or rather, by what emerges is a gesture, surely a "reach out", but the evidence that the saliva output is directed to Rosi and not unambiguously clear and reliable. If there is uniqueness, then the TV test is admissible, otherwise not.
So either three days or not. In the first case, then, if necessary for a reduction, equivalent to a penalty: those who spit for no reason it can not be punished the same way as those who do it for action. " 
Motivations - Here are the reasons for the sentence of the court's casual: "The Judge, received from the federal prosecutor and timely reporting ritual art. 35, 1.3, CGS (received by fax at 11:43 today) about the conduct of the 19 ° for the first time by the player Aleandro Rosi (Roma Soc) against the player Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) and immediately following the conduct of the player Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) against the player Aleandro Rosi (Soc.
Rome); acquired and examined their images on television (Sky), for full warranty and technical documents, notes, television pictures documenting that in the circumstances reported, the player yellow-red circle in center field, well away from the in progress in other areas of the field, the player approached the Neapolitan, who turned partially away, and from a distance of about one meter, with obvious gestures, addresses a spit, which was immediately "returned".
"This reprehensible act two was not seen by the referee and, therefore, no disciplinary action was taken. In this regard, the race director, at the request of this Office, said, via e-mail was received at 12:03 today, "... .... I did not see anything and also confirm that the warning made to players and Rosi Lavezzi refer ....
a mutual the pushes." Captured images can not be determined with absolute certainty to what extent and in what area of the body ( presumably the neck and face Lavezzi Rosi) spits actually hit their respective addressee, but that fact is irrelevant to the subject assessment. It is settled interpretative guidance of the governing bodies of sports justice, the sputum must be considered in all the effects of a "violent conduct", the details of which can be integrated even if the intent has not reached the regrettable '"target".
antisportività and the accentuation of such conduct renders irrelevant the motivation of the characters from both the ground . It follows the eligibility art. 35, n. 1.3 CGS "testing television" and the enforceability art. 19, No 4 letter b) of CGS conducted signaled that it is fair to quantify the terms specified in the device.
PQM resolution in relation to the reporting of the federal prosecutor, to penalize players Aleandro Rosi (Soc. Rome) and Ezequiel Ivan Lavezzi (Napoli Soc) with disqualification for three days of actual competition. "APPLICATION NAPLES - The Naples, heralding the already submitted application, as confirmed by the lawyer blue Mattia Grassani to Mars Radio:" We sent already heralding the complaint to the Federal Court of Justice.
It will be discussed Friday at 13 or 15. The reasons should be studied in detail and there is time before the trial until Friday. Napoli ask the complete withdrawal of the ban, since there is the certain proof of Spit Lavezzi to Rosi. Where are not made this our first thesis, will be asked for a reduced sentence.
"The lawyer also said a Radio Kiss Kiss you ask the inadmissibility of evidence for unreliability TV: "The emergency procedure chosen by Napoli in the root of this claim can deposit the grounds until the opening of the hearing Friday at 13 or 15 to the maximum, so there are three full days to prepare the grounds.
The input received from Società Sportiva Calcio Napoli is to point to the lifting of sanctions, which will be required on the assumption that already sports the words of the court does not appear with absolute certainty, then is not overcome reasonable doubt that it can bring, and only in the absence of which a body for sporting justice may impose the penalty.
The principle is that when in doubt, it takes on the alleged perpetrator, not condemnation and then in the light of the movie and the words used by Tosel, at least some uncertainty about how the drawing and gesture and texture of the rise and reads the words of Tosel. We wait for the movie according to which the judge ruled, because from there we will start at which point you will reach the final conclusion on the question of inadmissibility of evidence for non-uniqueness TV and unreliability in terms of technical and documentary.
Then we will proceed with an application for reduction in secondarily, if not accepted the request for withdrawal. "There is no 'CERTAINTY OF DOCUMENT" - "We saw on television the image - Grassani continues - and there is no certainty as to the salivary fluid leakage from the mouth of Lavezzi.
From these movies we've seen, it is not clear. Leaving aside what he did to Rosie Lavezzi, the Argentine was banned for spitting a reaction. That's why we asked for the acquisition of the media movie that led the judge to rule on the disqualification. According Tosel video gives evidence, reliability and certainty as to the dynamic behavior of the two players.
Awaiting only the segment-Rosi Lavezzi, in our opinion lacks the kind of uniqueness. Or rather, by what emerges is a gesture, surely a "reach out", but the evidence that the saliva output is directed to Rosi and not unambiguously clear and reliable. If there is uniqueness, then the TV test is admissible, otherwise not.
So either three days or not. In the first case, then, if necessary for a reduction, equivalent to a penalty: those who spit for no reason it can not be punished the same way as those who do it for action. "
- Aleandro Rosi Spits On Ezequiel Lavezzi In Roma's 2-0 Loss To Napoli (VIDEO) (14/02/2011)
- Roma's Rosi and Napoli's Lavezzi had a spit fight (14/02/2011)
- Napoli's Ezequiel Lavezzi & Roma's Aleandro Rosi Receive Three-Match Bans For Spitting At Each Other (14/02/2011)
- Ezequiel Lavezzi (Napoli) faces a ban for spitting in the face of Aleandro Rosi (Roma) (13/02/2011)
- Roma's Rosi blames Lavezzi for clash (13/02/2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment