NAPLES, Feb. 14 - "The test for tv Lavezzi is not applicable." Napoli's lawyer, Matthew Grassani, is convinced that there will be no penalties for the few after swapping spit with Rosie during Roma-Napoli. "Ensuring there is no disqualification, mainly based on images viewed on television from me - told Radio Kiss Kiss Napoli - Yesterday there was a confrontation with Dr.
Fassone a precautionary measure, because the crux of the matter is the reliability of the images. The ones I see on TV and the Internet can not be made use as evidence because they are unclear. But now the ball is in the hands of the court within the 16 sports that should rule on the TV test.
In addition, the sports court must also consider whether the images are clear in order to make use of TV evidence. There was a confession of the two players in the post-game? Statements of Rosi and Lavezzi can not be evidence of evaluation by the sports justice, because you can not do interviews jurisprudence, these confessions are supplied and on the sidelines of the event.
The case against the spitting is very hard, but if there are images the prosecutor can not be activated, and on the evidence available to me I can say that the images in question are unclear. Of course if it should apply the test tv, I would prefer to defend rather than Rosi Lavezzi of Napoli, because if the player had really spit, it did so only on the basis of a reaction.
The action is more severe reaction, this usually involves a shift in less than disqualification. " 
Fassone a precautionary measure, because the crux of the matter is the reliability of the images. The ones I see on TV and the Internet can not be made use as evidence because they are unclear. But now the ball is in the hands of the court within the 16 sports that should rule on the TV test.
In addition, the sports court must also consider whether the images are clear in order to make use of TV evidence. There was a confession of the two players in the post-game? Statements of Rosi and Lavezzi can not be evidence of evaluation by the sports justice, because you can not do interviews jurisprudence, these confessions are supplied and on the sidelines of the event.
The case against the spitting is very hard, but if there are images the prosecutor can not be activated, and on the evidence available to me I can say that the images in question are unclear. Of course if it should apply the test tv, I would prefer to defend rather than Rosi Lavezzi of Napoli, because if the player had really spit, it did so only on the basis of a reaction.
The action is more severe reaction, this usually involves a shift in less than disqualification. "
- Aleandro Rosi Spits On Ezequiel Lavezzi In Roma's 2-0 Loss To Napoli (VIDEO) (14/02/2011)
- Roma's Rosi and Napoli's Lavezzi had a spit fight (14/02/2011)
- Napoli's Ezequiel Lavezzi & Roma's Aleandro Rosi Receive Three-Match Bans For Spitting At Each Other (14/02/2011)
- Ezequiel Lavezzi (Napoli) faces a ban for spitting in the face of Aleandro Rosi (Roma) (13/02/2011)
- Ezequiel Lavezzi Faces Three-Match Ban For Spitting (14/02/2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment