NAPLES, Feb. 17 - Shortly before he left for Naples-Villarreal material the use of the Federal Court of Justice against the three-day suspension imposed on Lavezzi by a referee. From offices in the St. Paul was faxed to the dossier prepared by the Advocate Mattia Grassani. Another for information was sent to the Federal Prosecutor's Office.
The Naples seeks to obtain the lifting of the inadmissibility of evidence calling for the TV since the pictures are not clear and unambiguous in showing that the Argentine has really spat with Rosi. WORDS OF Grassani - Napoli is optimistic about the appeal to the Federal Court for allegedly spitting at Lavezzi after Rosi which cost him three-match ban with the TV test.
The lawyer for the club blue, Mattia Grassani, announced the filing of appeal explaining what it is based: "The appeal is formally submitted to the Federal Prosecutor's Office and the Federal Court of Justice, we have accelerated the rate of susceptibility to the judges tomorrow to 14 will gather to discuss the complaint, will have full knowledge quickly - told Radio Kiss Kiss Napoli -.
Yesterday we had a vision of the cd-rom containing the movie reviewed by Tosel. There is nothing new, our completion of the action has focused on the fact that there is full documentation and technical reliability. The video, though grainy and put the magnifying glass by means of high-tech, perhaps reveals some type of situation or gestures, but the code speaks of technical reliability, which in the original movie on Sky does not exist.
Document there is uncertainty, because in the natural size of the movie do not see any leakage from the mouth of salivary Lavezzi addressed to Rosi. In addition, the trial is televised, for the purpose of disqualification of a player, if and only if it offers, beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction of a violent conduct, and also in this respect, the absence of firm evidence, documentary that the footage does not show We insisted on the full withdrawal of the three-match ban.
The disqualification is alleged to Lavezzi, deductive, inductive, based on hearsay. But this is not the approach of the trial on television. The Federation has expressly stated that this submission must meet rigorous standards requirements. If these requirements are lacking, such as full technical reliability and therefore can not be sifting through the movie using sophisticated tools and therefore we can only commend the naked human eye, if there is no reliable documentary, here's the media that the video Prosecutor to submit to the court sports, the TV may not be admissible evidence.
And this is the battle that the Napoli is carrying. It can not be deprived for three days, only on a presumption or a simple clue, even in the race with AC Milan, Napoli, a major player like Lavezzi. Because the test is unique and shared in our complaint we have asked both parties to view it with the judges and the Federal Prosecutor's Office, just to show that there is evidence some of the responsibility of Lavezzi.
We demand the withdrawal of the ban, but only in the alternative, the reduction would not be acceptable solution, because there is a procedural defect which is upstream of the inadmissibility of evidence television. " 
The Naples seeks to obtain the lifting of the inadmissibility of evidence calling for the TV since the pictures are not clear and unambiguous in showing that the Argentine has really spat with Rosi. WORDS OF Grassani - Napoli is optimistic about the appeal to the Federal Court for allegedly spitting at Lavezzi after Rosi which cost him three-match ban with the TV test.
The lawyer for the club blue, Mattia Grassani, announced the filing of appeal explaining what it is based: "The appeal is formally submitted to the Federal Prosecutor's Office and the Federal Court of Justice, we have accelerated the rate of susceptibility to the judges tomorrow to 14 will gather to discuss the complaint, will have full knowledge quickly - told Radio Kiss Kiss Napoli -.
Yesterday we had a vision of the cd-rom containing the movie reviewed by Tosel. There is nothing new, our completion of the action has focused on the fact that there is full documentation and technical reliability. The video, though grainy and put the magnifying glass by means of high-tech, perhaps reveals some type of situation or gestures, but the code speaks of technical reliability, which in the original movie on Sky does not exist.
Document there is uncertainty, because in the natural size of the movie do not see any leakage from the mouth of salivary Lavezzi addressed to Rosi. In addition, the trial is televised, for the purpose of disqualification of a player, if and only if it offers, beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction of a violent conduct, and also in this respect, the absence of firm evidence, documentary that the footage does not show We insisted on the full withdrawal of the three-match ban.
The disqualification is alleged to Lavezzi, deductive, inductive, based on hearsay. But this is not the approach of the trial on television. The Federation has expressly stated that this submission must meet rigorous standards requirements. If these requirements are lacking, such as full technical reliability and therefore can not be sifting through the movie using sophisticated tools and therefore we can only commend the naked human eye, if there is no reliable documentary, here's the media that the video Prosecutor to submit to the court sports, the TV may not be admissible evidence.
And this is the battle that the Napoli is carrying. It can not be deprived for three days, only on a presumption or a simple clue, even in the race with AC Milan, Napoli, a major player like Lavezzi. Because the test is unique and shared in our complaint we have asked both parties to view it with the judges and the Federal Prosecutor's Office, just to show that there is evidence some of the responsibility of Lavezzi.
We demand the withdrawal of the ban, but only in the alternative, the reduction would not be acceptable solution, because there is a procedural defect which is upstream of the inadmissibility of evidence television. "
- Lavezzi, Rosi banned for spitting (15/02/2011)
- Roma's Rosi and Napoli's Lavezzi had a spit fight (14/02/2011)
- Aleandro Rosi Spits On Ezequiel Lavezzi In Roma's 2-0 Loss To Napoli (VIDEO) (14/02/2011)
- Roma's Rosi blames Lavezzi for clash (13/02/2011)
- Ezequiel Lavezzi (Napoli) faces a ban for spitting in the face of Aleandro Rosi (Roma) (13/02/2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment